Roots reinforce soil by acting as soil pins, dissipating shear stresses and anchoring the soil in place. By protruding into the soil and binding to soil particles, root hairs increase root-soil contact and aid root anchorage. However, it is not yet known whether this ability to anchor roots affects the root system’s ability to reinforce soil. Using a laboratory box shearing rig, this study explores whether root hairs affect soil shear resistance. The force required to shear soil columns permeated with roots lacking root hairs (barley brb and maize rth3 mutants) are compared to columns permeated with hairy roots (their respective wild types, WT) using unplanted soil columns as controls. Known root traits (e.g. root length density, root surface area density, average diameter, percentage of fine roots, and root tensile strength) were measured to ensure that differences in shear resistance could be attributed to the presence/absence of root hairs. All rooted columns required more force to shear than their respective unplanted columns but the thicker, stronger maize roots were more effective at soil reinforcement than the more numerous but weaker barley roots. After the maximum growth period, root hairs appeared to have a consistent and significant impact on peak shearing force. However, the WT root systems also produced greater root surface area density. As the rate at which peak shearing force increased with increasing root surface area density was similar for roots with and without root hairs, the increased peak shearing force of the WT columns cannot be attributed to resistance supplied by the presence of root hair but rather to a more prolific root system. Therefore, it was concluded that root diameter and root tensile strength most influenced root reinforcement of soil and as such, the relatively minute root hairs had negligible effects compared to their parent roots. Three pH values (acidic, neutral, and basic) in aqueous solution, six extraction solvents (methanol, acetonitrile, acetone, phosphate-buffered saline, deionised water, and dichloromethane), different compositions of selected solvent mixtures and their sequential extraction, and a series of extraction times (15, 45, 60, 120, 240, and 480 min) were evaluated. The ideal condition for hair extraction is ultrasonic-assisted extraction with methanol:phosphate-buffered saline 50:50 (v/v) under +55 °C for 240 min. This strategy may secure the true composition of the metabolome, maximise the signal abundance, and guarantee a high coverage of wide-range metabolites in a straightforward approach.

A standard EDITORIAL TRACKING SYSTEM is utilized for manuscript submission, review, editorial processing and tracking which can be securely accessed by the authors, reviewers and editors for monitoring and tracking the article processing. Manuscripts can be uploaded online at Editorial Tracking System (https://www.longdom.org/submissions/hair-therapy-transplantation.html) or forwarded to the Editorial Office at hairtherapy@emedscholar.com

Media Contact:               

Sandra Jones

Journal Manager

Hair Therapy and Transplantation

Email: hairtherapy@emedscholar.com